🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.